Posts

Consolations (For not Having a Horse-Sized Cock)

"All porn is revenge porn." All insult, is defused, by better understanding the context, where the insult exists. In other words, if you knew everything there was to know, you wouldn't be insulted, everyone who is insulting would be insulted, and, you would not partake. So, let's see if that statement holds any water, in the issue of penis size. You might be jealous, and envious, for example. The average penis size, in North America, is 5.5 inches. However, If you watch porn, with zero exceptions, there are a grand total, of zero men, consuming unlimited amounts of sex, who are any less than 10", in size. And, we are only talking about porn stars. However, if you broaden the search, to include amateurs, the minimum size, doesn't go any lower.  So, you may be tempted, to make an invalid comparison. Invalid, means, not valid. For example, you cannot compared a Ford, to a Lamborghini. That's an invalid comparison. The value of the Lamborghini, exists in comp...

Upgrades From Performative

Image
Euripes: He is not a lover who does not love forever. Just as an exercise in brain growth, take this word, "forever", and let's apply it, and see how many places it lands, in reality. If you love forever, then, your love is timeless, yes? So, let's get "always" out the way, so we can attack the idea "the same." If you love forever, it also means that, you love, in all times, the same. For example, if we were talking about some sweet, manly husband love, " He is no lover, who does not love, in all times, the same." Wow, so, is Euripedes actually telling us, that the quality of a husband's love, has to be the same, inside and outside of having sex, or, he is no husband? Whaaaa How do you love the same as when you're having sex, when you're not having sex?  Do the same thing, with the word "One." They used to have an old saying, " It's all one ." And, what that meant, was that you absolutely lo...

Story-Telling Within The Story (Unreality Within the Realities)

There are two possible degrees of separation, between a human being, and reality.  1. Childhood impressions created in the absence of fear, in confidence, can give a child an impression of reality. However, if they are in a state of fear, without confidence, then, the impression they gather has no information about reality within it. Impressions, are how Childish minds realize the truth about reality, and, whatever has been realized, can be identified every future time that reality manifests. With no impression of the manifestation, the manifestation cannot be realized. This is the first degree. You can not know what you do not know of. 2. Second degree of separation, depends on what they came to believe about communication. If they believe that words have creative power,  instead of what they actually have, which is descriptive power, then, they only use words to cancel out the truth-telling of their victims, and surround their victims with so many lies that their victim's st...

True Lies (Mind Control)

"Man moves in a world that is nothing more or less than his consciousness objectified." – Neville Goddard There is no direct argument, for the existence of reality. And, I think that says a lot. Why is it, or, rather, how could it be, that the Human rational mind cannot prove the existence of reality to itself?  "For life makes no mistakes and always gives man that which man first gives himself." - Neville Goddard, The Law: And Other Essays on Manifestation There is an easy answer, to this, of course. The easiest way to envision there being a divide, is the electronic component, called a DAC. DAC stands for Digital Audio Converter. On one end, it receives analog signals. On the other end, it outputs binary data. And, if you want a computer to produce sound, you need a reverse DAC. It receives a binary data stream, and, converts binary data to analog signal, which can be amplified, and listened to, that sounds like music. However, if you output binary data, directly,...

Protection, From First Principles

So, if you have an existent relationship bond, if there is a functional agreement, in effect, then, both parties will be damaged, if the agreement fails, for any reason at all. That is first principles, first principle: Live together, or, die alone. Second first principle, is that relationship bonds, & relationship agreements do not have to deliver, in any way shape, or form, because they are not anything that contributes to the development of healthy self-esteem, and the value of your person.  However, once a mutual agreement has been established, for it to fail, or fail to deliver, all parties involved are reduced. Because something they agreed did not occur, all parties take an equal sized fall. That is also first principles, first principles. Because, betrayal, doesn't refer to what Judas did, when he sold out Jesus. Betrayal, is failure to meet needs. And, everyone's need, is that something they say is true, proves true, otherwise you are proven a liar, publicly. So, f...

Relay-tionship

So, I've got this guy, and, he's the most insulting person I've ever met, so, I've asked him to really think about it, and tell me, where, (else, or anywhere) in his life, he has had the power to tell someone who they are? Outside of insulting me, when has he told anyone who they are, successfully? The answer, of course, is never, nowhere, and not at all, and, not any amount. So, I'm asking him, in the moment that he insults me, in the moment that he said that insult, where is his attention? Always? Who is he looking at, when the word, "Jerk" is said? And, the answer to that question, obviously, is, himself. It's obvious to everyone who isn't blind and everyone who isn't him. He's always looking at himself, when the insult is being generated, in fact his words are aimed at himself. And you know what? He'a wrong! He's wrong about himself! He's not a jerk. He's an idiot. He can't even tell himself who he is, successfully, ...

What Is A Promise?

 Since the only relationship, is the relationship of relationships within yourself, parts of yourself can be committed to things, and integrity can be lacking. That means, not every part of you, knows what every part of you is committed to, or trying to commit to. So, the value, of coming out, and stating your intentions, is that that tells your entire soul what commitment point you wish to evaluate, and then, your entire soul, will make a decision on whether or not that is your commitment point.  So, you see, stating your intentions, is about taking something you might be committed to, partway, or, only within part of you, and it's about informing the rest of your soul, in order to create the conditions for consent. Consent, is about every part of your being, committed to, or, committing, the same commitment. So, you see, stating your intentions, is not a "for someone else" thing. It is for yourself.  That communication exists as a question you are posing, to yourself, t...